李衎，2000 年出生于浙江。艺术启蒙始于杭州中国美术学院附中，后毕业于伦敦建筑联盟学院，获得建筑学学士和硕士学位。
他的实践游走于空间分析与知识生产之间，将视觉性转化为一种认识论手段。在设计和研究之外，他长期投身于当代艺术与文化传播相关的编辑工作。这些经历使他得以在不同专业语境中穿行，在不牺牲原有概念精度的前提下，将深度内容转译为更具流通性的表达形式。
其工作的核心是一项持续的探询：感知的方式如何划定行动的可能。他以建筑学思维为基点，在视觉文化、技术系统与科学探究的交汇处展开工作，追问图像、文本、数据与协议如何共同界定了可见与可能的边界。
在市场理性与技术加速的支配逻辑下，设计的自主性往往被一种趋于确定性、以交付为导向的生产惯性所消解。他所关注的，是如何在这样的限制条件下展开工作，将设计的产出过程视为重新定义问题框架的机会，将设计的成果转化为可供他人继承与延伸的架构。在此，设计被重新定义为一种生成性装置；其能动性的回归，不在于确立作者身份，而在于重塑行动发生的条件。
过去两年，他通过与艺术家、科学家、研究者及开发者的协作，致力于将离散的信息提炼为可共享的知识体系。他的实践以空间研究与视觉表述为核心，涵盖设计、写作、编辑、影像创作及视觉散文等载体。从学术研究的呈现、公共议题的传播到品牌身份的建构，他都致力于通过整体性的叙事框架与视觉统筹，为项目找到兼具辨识度与深度的文化表达。
Kan Li was born in 2000 in Zhejiang, China. His artistic formation began at the Affiliated High School to China Academy of Art in Hangzhou, and he later graduated from the Architectural Association in London with a BA and an MArch.
His practice unfolds between aesthetic inquiry and spatial strategy, where visuality becomes an epistemological instrument. Alongside design and research, he has sustained a parallel engagement with editorial work across contemporary art and cultural communication. This experience that has sharpened his capacity to move between disciplinary registers, carrying complex ideas across audiences without flattening meanings.
At the core of this work lies a persistent inquiry: how the mode of perception delimits the scope of action. Anchored in architectural thinking, he works at the intersection of visual culture, technological systems, and scientific inquiry, examining how images, texts, measurement, data, and protocols shape what can be seen and acted upon.
Amidst the prevailing logic of market rationality and technological acceleration, the autonomy of design is often eroded by an inertia toward certainty and deliverable-oriented production. What interests him is how to work within these constraints, reviving the design process as an opportunity to reframe the problem and the designed outcome as a structure others can inherit and extend. Design, in this sense, is redefined as a generative device; its agency returns not as a claim of authorship, but as a capacity to reshape the conditions under which action occurs.
Over the past two years, he has worked closely with artists, scientists, researchers, and developers to turn dispersed material into knowledge that can circulate. His practice takes spatial analysis and visual articulation as its base, extending into design, writing, editing, moving image, and visual essay. Across academic research, public communication, and brand identity, he brings integrated narrative structure and visual coherence to projects that need a clear and substantive cultural voice.